[CF-GA03-RATIONALE] Should K increased?

Cardano Foundation iCC Vote on Info Governance Action ‘Should K increased?’

The Cardano Foundation has completed its constitutional assessment of the governance action “Should K increased?" (Action ID: gov_action10lty9xka3unprtvdfrqvcjgsz33sjwhv9p06afqzar8au782trtsq7dhd95) and deemed it to be unconstitutional. As a member of the Interim Constitutional Committee (iCC), we are responsible for reviewing the constitutionality of all governance actions submitted to the blockchain.

For a detailed explanation of our assessment, please refer to our full rationale available in the following PDF hosted via IPFS:

https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmRo3rYvwpTd2AxH3kK6jTBdr1VtPbe855MRYwHLEqi9ww


Rationale Summary:

The governance action, “Should K increased?”, is deemed unconstitutional due to insufficient rationale to justify the action and the provision of irrelevant supporting materials, which contravene Article III, Section 6 of the Interim Constitution.

This vote solely assesses the constitutionality of the action and does not indicate support or express any opinion regarding the underlying proposal of increasing the K parameter (stakePoolTargetNum). Voicing an opinion is the duty of the Delegated Representatives (DReps) and Stake Pool Operators (SPOs) and remains outside the scope of the Interim Constitutional Committee (iCC).

4 Likes