# CIP Royalties-777 version 2.0

**URL:** <https://forum.cardano.org/t/cip-royalties-777-version-2-0/83665>\
**Category:** CIPs\
**Created:** [7 November 2021 17:05 UTC](https://forum.cardano.org/t/cip-royalties-777-version-2-0/83665 "2021-11-07T17:05:37Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 21

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![havealoha](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/f04885/32.png) [@havealoha](https://forum.cardano.org/u/havealoha)\
**Post date:** [15 February 2022 03:38 UTC](https://forum.cardano.org/t/cip-royalties-777-version-2-0/83665/21 "2022-02-15T03:38:01Z")

</div>

Maybe have a look at the 808 proposal. It copies the 777 functionality but adds off chain correlated accounts to verify collections.

> [@CIP Proposal for discussion " Market CNFT policyID verification "](https://forum.cardano.org/t/cip-proposal-for-discussion-market-cnft-policyid-verification/95268/18):
>
> ##This is draft 2 which supercedes the first draft at the top of the post. CIP Proposal for discussion “Market CNFT policyID verification” Simple Summary A community standard for CNFT policyID verification utilizing a no name asset with tag 808 correlated with one or more online or onchain accounts by confirming policyID information from each source. This proposed standard will allow for verification of CNFT policyID’s across the secondary market space. Existing policyID verification varies b…

@Huth_S0lo How does a proposer get developers from the stores to come and look at a proposed cip? Ive started the one linked above but have no idea if any store developers are aware. I think it might benefit all stores.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.cardano.org/t/cip-royalties-777-version-2-0/83665)._
