Exactly, these standardized and synchronized methods will also help proposers and reviewers.
Personally, I still prefer the solution of having at least 2 rounds to screen proposals to reduce the amount of information for voters, thereby leading to more accurate decision-making. The idea is not to point out good or bad proposals, but just to classify which is better than the other.
I also understand that the previous strategy was to increase the quantity and scalability of catalysts, but quantity and quality are 2 factors that can almost never grow simultaneously and quickly. So sometimes we need quality-oriented funds.