For what it’s worth: Two and a half year old discussions about the possibility to game such a system with sock puppets (and the inability of “DID” shenanigans to counter that):
… or they could distribute 1 million on 100 accounts with 10 000 DOT/ADA and, hence, 100 votes for a total of 10 000 votes.
… or on 10 000 accounts with 100 DOT/ADA and, hence, 10 votes for a total of 100 000 votes.
… or on 1 million accounts for a total of 1 million votes.
Depends on how important the vote is if it is worth the effort to do this splitting. …, but we want to do really important votes.
Registering an account could be made expensive to discourage this, but that would, of cour…
Hi all, I’ve not used the Cardano Forums for a long time because I’m generally on Twitter - but the ideas I want to discuss here far exceed the character limit.
In our discussion on CIP-1694 many people are uncomfortable with the 1-coin-1-vote system of governance that is being proposed. While a few propose 1-person-1-vote, many call for a “middle ground” of “quadratic voting” as used in the Gitcoin grants program . This use of Quadratic Voting was explored in the article “Liberal Radicalism: A…
2 Likes