Fund 14: Quadratic Voting

Well, I tried. Have a good day, sir. Targeted insults is where I don’t normally continue. Thank you for your kind understanding, I’ll leave you to it. @HeptaSean

You identify far too much with your employer. Work for a shitty company. Get the heat for it. :woman_shrugging:

all fine, thanks a lot for answering and clearing things up Danny :slight_smile:
much appreciated

what a highly thoughtful piece of text, that surely makes the world a better place ye XD

I tried it for years.

For each marginal improvement – much too small given what a horribly broken embarrassment Catalyst has always been – there were two steps back.

Mostly because the toxic positivity circle jerk in the “townhalls” with all its American “I appreciate you so much!!!” fake friendliness thought it was a good idea.

Announcement from Catalyst for Fund14 Voting.
So, what it means, things may break..

Objective:
Applying Quadratic voting for more fair vote turnout:

Observations:

  • applying quadratic voting doesnt works out
  • ends up concentrating funding to a small group of projects

Result:
voting mechanics stay same as in previous round, no quadratic voting will be applied


What a joke these amateurs are.