After good discussions – Thank you for that! Please continue! – I see (not surprisingly) other proposals – in this thread and in the other spaces linked. Some might be combinable with mine, some are alternatives.
I’d like to get an impression on two (meta) questions that drove my initial post and the core demands at its end:
How urgent do you think improvements are?
- Catalyst is fine as it is.
- Catalyst needs ever-ongoing improvements, but we can continue the experiment and do them step by step.
- Catalyst needs significant improvements, before the next fund is started.
0 voters
How should improvements be found?
- Catalyst is fine as it is.
- The current approach – engaged community is working out improvements and Catalyst team implements the consensus – is working fine.
- Improvements can be worked out in the engaged community, but all ADA holders should vote on them in the end.
- We need a broad discussion about improvements in many different groups and a vote by all ADA holders in the end.
0 voters
(Of course, this will be just people active in the forum who find this poll. And, of course, the result depends on my choice of questions and answers. But I hope it can at least give an impression.)