So anybody knows how, and more importantly when we can put this to a vote?
I don’t see hwy we couldn’t make it one of the early votes, but we’ll need time in advance to prepare and campaign.
Here is a suggestion for the motto of this thread anyway, summarized so concisely by @johnshearing :
"Give us a privacy option.
Give us a full transparency option too."
Just bringing it back slightly, original argument presented by @philpa was that of the pledge amount being public, which I say should be a choice for the operator whether or not to disclose.
This thread has slightly mutated into a whole host of topics of privacy, so we need to decide which part of the eco system are we focused on.
Correct me if I’m wrong here people, but I would like someone to start designing the whole thing, so we can decide on the principals together early on.
Regarding the original suggestion by @philpa, I’m undecided on that.
But of course, that’s something that can also be put to a vote in itself.
Thanks @MachTwo, That’s the big question: How to we build Cardano such that our wealthy citizens do not need to hide in order to be safe? If we can figure this one out then we can all enjoy the benefits of transparency which is a world without large scale corruption.
There are several things we can build into a Cardano lightchain that will make ADA more valuable to it’s community while making it worthless to criminals.
- One idea is to make a lightchain that supports reversible transactions when a voting body of Cardano governance finds criminal activity. Not all Cardano chains would have this feature - just the lightchains. So it’s a choice. Or perhaps the feature could be implemented on individual accounts on any chain via a smart contract if the holder chooses to have it. No criminal would want to steal these kinds of accounts if it’s function is advertised (transparent).
- IOHK is already considering how build identity management into Cardano. This was originally proposed to help the undocumented poor but it could be built into the lightchain option such that it is impossible to move funds to anyone that is not documented. This type of money is worthless to criminals but valuable to holders not only for personal safety but because it limits the habitat where criminals and kleptocrats can operate. In other words it makes the world safer and richer.
- Multisignature wallets and smart contracts might be implemented to make large accounts undesirable to criminals. Very few criminals would go after funds that require going through several people.
- ATMs limit the amount of money that can be withdrawn in a single day. That’s to reduce the incentive for criminals to attack people using ATMs. What criminal would go after a smart wallet with this feature if they knew in advance what it was?
- Perhaps it would be reasonable to put large funds into a smart contract that requires the recipient go to a secured location make the transaction where identification is required and arrests can be made for attempted theft.
- Pilots set their transponders to 7500 as a silent alarm during a hijacking. Perhaps it would be good to have a smart wallet that has a normal spending password and another password that would alert law enforcement when making a payment under duress. Perhaps the code would automatically and silently activate a beacon on the cellphone or computer being used to make the payment and law enforcement could be immediately dispatched to those GPS coordinates. Meanwhile, software activated by the beacon is collecting any known information about the receiving address and sending it to law enforcement. This last feature would work better on an optional lightchain where all addresses are known via the Cardano documentation process.
There are many more ways to approach this problem but they all require transparency because if criminals don’t understand who owns holdings in lightchains or hardened smart contracts then they may mistake the holder for an easy victim. So transparency is now security. That was not the case in the days before smart money. The world has changed. Secrecy is no longer a protection. Worse, secrecy is the habitat were corruption thrives. Still there are times when citizens, corporations, and government must be able to spend in secret so it must be an option even though secrecy generally makes the world poorer and more miserable.
Hi @Trigger, Yes that was brought up as a major concern but he did say that he was addressing those not concerned as much about privacy and he also addressed secrecy regarding taxes and about other people knowing his business in general. He introduced a wide range of topics.
The people who are not as concerned with privacy are the people who are more concerned with transparency. We are neighbors - like the land and the sea. In this time of global warming, more sea means less land and this has some people who live on the land a bit concerned. I am very grateful that @philpa has invited his transparency neighbors into this dialog with the privacy community.
Concerning the focus of our conversation, we must consider who is affected by what we talked about and our responsibilities to them. The people affected are our children because these are the people who will have to live with whatever we decide to build today. Together we must discuss as much as we can during this early stage of development so that we leave our children with something that will make their lives better and not worse.
I am so grateful to have this opportunity to hear your concerns and to tell you about mine.
Thanks for your input John, great points raised and interesting to see so many ways the privacy issue could be resolved. If we could put Multisig, limit transactions etc. with a simple on/off switch within the wallets each person could then set their own security/privacy and at the same time it gives us an opportunity to educate the user.
Probably like most things in life it will be our ability to adapt that will be the solution not the individual solution itself
Excellent point @philpa !
Privacy is very very important. Many times i like to send tip to people but i dont since i dont want them to see what i have in my wallet so i usually ask if they accept Monero or Zcoin which usually isnt the case.
Not that i have so much or anything but still i dont like others to know what i have.
As long as we dont have privacy we dont have fungibility.
I hope Charles and team add privacy in the map so we can have a target date, tech and can follow up on progress.
Perhaps structure may already be in place to tip in ADA with out exposing knowledge of your wealth.
If I am thinking correctly, you could open an account with one of many exchanges that accept ADA.
You would wire money from a regular bank to that exchange.
This would be your tipping account.
Then tip whomever you want without exposing your wealth and without fear of breaking any tax law.
I understand this is not what you asked for and it’s not what you want.
You want the ability to spend privately from any Cardano account.
But if I am thinking clearly, this method hides your wealth, your identity, and keeps you within the boundaries of tax law without the need to do any reporting.
Is this a workable solution at least in the short term?
Privacy does not matter for privacy’s sake. Privacy only matters in so much that we are able to own our data, and put it to work on our terms.
Data Ownership > Data Privacy
Privacy is an aspect of data ownership, but should not be the end goal.
Privacy on its own cannot last, because the incentive to nonconsensually remove another’s privacy will remain. The only way to remove that incentive, is if we own our data.
If we own our data, spending resources to take someone else’s data will act as an attack on ourselves, as we ignore the state of our own data in favor of someone else’s.
It’s not a coincidence that large tech monopolies like facebook are able to evangelize the merits of privacy, while owning all our data.