Browsing to try and get the feel of this appealing project, it strikes difficult to see where ADA belongs and creates value as ROI.
- Cardano foundation is supervising the Cardano Blockchain, which is then a cost center.
- The blockchain itself appears not connected to ADA as investment and is supposed to maintain own cost, which sounds like a non profit target.
- IOHK is holding the commercial part and will create value, but didn’t stumble upon the connection between IOHK and ADA capital injection.
Need help to try and kill a thought that ADA could be funding the development and supervision of Cardano Blockchain, but the commercial value of apps running on it, is owned and managed separately in IOHK with no ROI to ADA holders?
This must off course be a wrong impression, but it would be greatly appreciated if a kind person could point me in the right direction on this relationship and ADA profitability?
In other words: What creates organic development and value in an open source non profit blockchain and supervisor foundation, funded by ADA holders?
Thank you in advance for any help on clarifying.