Welcome back to this experiment where we are making sense of noosphere through text. We began our discussion with civics.
Civics is a social science. 
Social science (often rendered in the plural as the social sciences) is one of the branches of science, devoted to the study of societies and the relationships among members within those societies.
Civics is the study or science of the privileges and obligations of citizens.
But who is a citizen of Cardano?
To better fit our context let us use citizens and Cardano Community interchangeably.
We are making sense of privileges and obligations as relationships between citizens of the Cardano Community. I wonder the article here: I was corrected talking about the Cardano Community as opposed to Cardano Communities.
Let’s look more closely at how the Cardano Community defines itself:
choose to follow in the footsteps of the early Internet and cryptocurrency pioneers, who first forged bonds of community through digital technologies.
I hope by now you are wondering about the title of the article!
Relationships between members of the Open Source movement are captured insightfully by Eric S. Raymond.
Homesteading is the essay examines issues of project ownership and transfer, as well as investigating possible anthropological roots of the gift culture in open source as contrasted with the exchange culture of closed source software. Raymond also investigates the nature of the spread of open source into the untamed frontier of ideas he terms the noosphere, postulating that projects that range too far ahead of their time fail because they are too far out in the wilderness, and that successful projects tend to relate to existing projects.
projects that range too far ahead of their time fail because they are too far out in the wilderness let that sync for a bit…
It certainly feels like we are ahead of our time.
Does it feel like we are too far out in the wilderness?