Delegation Saturation for DReps?

[1 year, 8 months ago, a survey was conducted on X to gather thoughts on the question “What should the saturation limit range for dReps be?”. Credits to @StakeWithPride.

It was interesting to learn from that survey that 53.7% of respondents wanted a saturation limit set at 50 million ADA or less, whereas 17.4% wanted no saturation limit introduced.

This was before the bootstrapping phase, and now that we are in the bootstrapping phase with about 490+ DReps already registered and receiving delegation, I want to gather your thoughts once more on the topics: Should there be delegation saturation for DReps? and Should there be a “Cap” on total DReps?


Thanks for sharing your thoughts as we learn to grow together to ensure a meaningful governance system for the ecosystem.

3 Likes

I think there should be delegation saturation for DReps but NO cap on the total DReps.

Thanks for sharing your thoughts Seidu, do you mind discussing this further?

Sure, we can have discussion on that. Indeed, camping total DReps Will make the DReps program close to centralized.

Speaking of delegation saturation, I would also vote for 50M Ada with the view of maintaining balance in the voting system and reducing the risk of concentrated influence in one pool promoting centralized power.
i also dont support capping of total dReps even though that idea might be to manage the dRep ecosystem size. I think since this is a new initiative, we adopt periodic evaluations and adapt as demand and delegation dynamics evolve