Thanks for the comment @COSDpool .
I’m Oscar, an ECC member.
Yes, basically, the Interim Constitutional Committee considers the constitutionality of governance actions based on the Interim Constitution. As far as the technicalities are concerned, I guess an example would be something like this.
If a governance action is submitted that sets maxBlockBodySize set to 0: there is something in the interim constitution that defines a guardrail for that parameter (These provisions allow the ICC to assess the governance action as unconstitutional and cast a No vote.).
However, governance always comes with variables, and it is difficult to define a constitution to include all the cases that can occur. While the Constitutional Committee will naturally consider reasonableness and feasibility as part of the process, the Cardano Interim Constitution will be the overriding criterion for assessing constitutionality.
I think it’s also important to communicate with the community during this process. Even the same constitution can be interpreted from different perspectives on some of its provisions. We are here tobe the voice of the Cardano community (although all decisions will be based on the interim constitution), and that’s why I think it’s important to get feedback from the community during the course of the interim constitution committee’s work.
*My comments do not represent the views of the entire ECC.