I’m just not with Charles on that one (like on many other points). I think capitalism is very much bad in itself. Is that forbidden in this space?
That is, as far as I understand it, exactly the content of @Michael.Liesenfelt’s proposal: Pledge determines saturation. If you do not pledge enough, you will have lower saturation and, hence, lower rewards.
I have stated time and again that I would support that. But it is a risk to small pool operators that do not have enough own funds for a large pledge. And it won’t stop Binance from just pledging more. I’m quite sure they can optimise their cash flow so that they can afford much larger pledges.