What's the future of ADA?

English General Discussions
1

What’s the future of ADA Please tell me.

How many companies in this ecosystem have received millions in funding, yet how many have actually brought new users to Cardano

This is the part nobody wants to talk about.

If we want ADA to truly grow, the reality is simple.

We need outside investors.

We need USDT.

We need real liquidity and real TVL coming onto the chain, not recycled ADA and not another round of Catalyst proposals.

I have watched this ecosystem for years through cycles, hype, promises, and resets. At some point we have to admit the truth. Catalyst cannot be the economic engine of Cardano. It does not bring new liquidity. It does not onboard users from outside the ecosystem. It does not attract serious capital.

Other chains are growing because they understand something Cardano has not fully embraced.

External money flow.

Solana, Base, BNB and even smaller L2s bring in USDT, attract large LPs, and welcome liquidity providers who were not already in their communities. That is why their growth outpaces ADA by a wide margin.

Meanwhile, how many Cardano projects have raised millions but failed to create meaningful TVL or adoption

This is why the growth is slow.

This is why the chart moves the way it moves.

This is why ADA struggles while other chains accelerate.

If ADA’s future is going to change, then the priorities must change.

Bring real stablecoin rails to Cardano.

Bring USDT.

Invite external capital and liquidity providers.

Stop depending on Catalyst as the foundation.

Grow TVL through outside money, not internal grants.

Attract users who do not already hold ADA.

Cardano is a top ten trending token, but trends mean nothing if liquidity does not follow.

If we want ADA to reach its true potential, we need to stop looking inward and start bringing the world in.

The technology exists.

The potential is massive.

But without real liquidity and outside investors, nothing moves.

ADA’s future depends on USDT, TVL, and external capital, not recycled funding and internal loops.

This is the truth nobody wants to say, but it is the truth that needs to be said.

One thing I want to ask everyone here. What do you think

1 Like
2

I largely agree that external liquidity and real TVL are essential to accelerating ADA’s growth. Without capital inflows, even the most advanced technology will eventually slow down.

That said, it’s important to recognize that Catalyst’s impact has not been uniform. Some funded projects failed to achieve meaningful adoption, while others were well executed, delivered tangible products, and built real solutions on the blockchain.

Catalyst should therefore not be viewed as a liquidity engine, but rather as an ecosystem-development tool. When used effectively, it helps lay solid foundations in terms of infrastructure, education, tooling, and community growth.

In my view, the real challenge today is not to replace Catalyst, but to build on what it has enabled by complementing it with robust stablecoins and structured external capital. A good example of this direction is the recent initiative involving the Cardano Foundation, Draper Dragon, and Draper University, which proposes the creation of a US$80M fund dedicated to scaling Cardano adoption over a multi-year horizon. This type of vehicle is designed to support Cardano’s next phase of growth through direct investments in high-potential startups, growth capital for liquidity, exchange access, and global market expansion, and educational support via accelerators and developer programs, while also aiming to return value back to the Cardano Treasury over time.
Read more here: Scaling Global Adoption: Cardano and Draper Dragon Partner for Strategic $80M Fund

Thank you for raising this point, this is an important discussion the ecosystem needs to have.

3

I found 80 million to be a bit expensive for a proposal with an impact similar to Catalyst

4

This is a great point, and I agree that an objective analysis would be extremely valuable. It would be helpful to evaluate the total capital Catalyst has distributed and compare it to the measurable value it has brought to the chain in terms of adoption, tooling, and long term impact.

From what I have seen, proposals are funded through community voting, which raises an important question. If the voting base is not primarily composed of investors, builders, or people with the expertise to evaluate economic impact, then how do we ensure that capital consistently flows to teams that can actually drive TVL, liquidity, and real growth into the ecosystem

When voting power is not aligned with experience or the ability to assess ROI, the risk of misallocation becomes significant.

I do agree with your point that Catalyst should be treated as an ecosystem development tool, not a liquidity engine. It has produced useful infrastructure in some areas, but that is exactly why it needs to be complemented with external capital, stablecoins, and structured investment if we want Cardano to scale beyond internal funding loops.

Thank you for sharing the Draper Dragon initiative. I will take a deeper look at it. This is the direction Cardano needs if the goal is to expand globally, improve liquidity, and attract new users beyond the existing community.

Appreciate your perspective and your response.

1 Like
5

Yeah I get what you mean. Eighty million is a lot, and if the impact ends up being similar to Catalyst, then it really wouldn’t make sense.

I read more about it too, and honestly for me it all comes down to the VC’s track record. What companies have they actually helped grow What value did those companies bring to the chains they worked with And most importantly, do they actually deliver on what they say they will do. It would definitely be worth talking to some of the teams they’ve invested in to see how that support helped them get where they are today, whether that’s mainstream adoption or real traction.

If the VC really has the connections to bring real TVL, stablecoins, and outside liquidity into Cardano, then that’s something we haven’t seen yet. And if they can actually do that, it benefits everyone here, especially if ADA ever starts moving toward five dollars and not dipping back down to a couple cents again.

But yeah, at the end of the day, we won’t know until the results show up.

6

Personally, I don’t think it has the same nature as Project Catalyst, since it explicitly targets certain returns over a defined period, particularly in favor of Cardano’s TVL growth.

That said, I believe development is a process. In my response to this post, I shared an example to illustrate the kinds of actions or initiatives that Cardano may need "in complement to Project Catalyst" in order to see its TVL grow over time.

Thank you for your response to my comment.