Lol, is it about the nature of the proposal itself, or it became like whatever @bercinho proposed is bad.
I think community representatives (or the delegation representatives at the later stage) will be formed eventually. I guess it’s okay to use individual approach in opinions stage, but when it comes to decision stage, then sort of the representation or delegation have to be made.
Now even the new CF has to be watched, did the new CF answer any of the question that the community raised during the Parsons time? Were the ada address and financial statements disclosed yet? What’s up with regaining community trust? 
There’s no effective way to pressure or push IOHK/Emurgo/CF right now, while Iohk and Emurgo are leading CF now, there’s no real CF anymore. Anyone with any suggestion can easily be ignored, and They can be selective with the things they want to hear.
This is just not good.
We need a good community representation to express community’s best interests. At least we need people who are able to challenge and tell them where might be wrong (even if they felt it’s right), jusy like the “tenth man rule” in the world war Z.
I don’t know what’s the plan and what’s the timeframe that CF going to do that (or maybe there’s no plan), so I guess the community has to do it by itself if you care enough.