Need your help as I am novice on all the Cardano technicals.This is the first ever time I am trying to install any wallet on my personal computer.
Intrigued by the functionality of voting I want to download DAEDALUS WALLET.
I like following the rules so I am trying to verify the signature before the installation of Catalyst.
I am using macOS big sur 11.1 version. i follow the process and
1.SHA256 checksum is verified correctly with the terminal (checked all the numbers)
2. I sign in correctly and I verify with the details D325 87D4 090F E461 CAEE 0FF4 966E 5CB9 CBFA A9BA as per instructions.
However, at the very end this is the last verification I get.
Thank you for the reply but I am not sure when you give me the link with instructions how this will help me.
As mentioned I followed everything step by step and on my last verification I receive this message.
So as mentioned above is if this is the message I should be receiving cause on instructions says otherwise or actually what I get is similar with the instructions but the numbers before the end are not being mentioned.
Please advise cause I have tried several times and I always get the same similar but not exactly the same.
Can I consider that I have verified the installer to continue with installation ?
I think I went through the same process with the same problem. The confusion is because this instruction below from the catalyst website:
" The Verification Results dialog will then appear with the verdict in the Result column:
âSigned by: IOHK Signing Authority 1471941A â full trustâ â if successful
âŚanything else means there was no valid signature for the installer.
This does not match the actual text results given when checking the PGP signature. Instead, I get this:
I think itâs basically the same thing, and probably a valid signature verification, but given the application here, shouldnât these results match perfectly, and not be âclose enoughâ ?
First off, youâre doing an optional verification using a method thatâs not specific to Cardano, its pretty common way to verify application signatures (you could do the same with any binary - for example , check here for OpenOffice ). The instructions are provided as sample to help you with verification and walk through the process.
Secondly, verifying SHA256 and PGP signature are two seperate process as shown on download page. Running SHA256 does not give you the prompt you shared in original post, and as you mention it was verified successfully using SHA256 method.
For PGP verification (second type of verification), the prompt you see is mentioned message simply is showing a different text, perhaps due to versions of GPG . At the most it is a documentation update that we need, I will pass that on to IOG who host the website.
It is for Windows, not relevant to you and you do not need to care either.
Thank you so much for the replies guys! I guess I cannot trust to download the wallet if this documentation on macOS is not updated.
Will wait for the update on their documentation on macOS otherwise based on their documentation is not a verifiable signature to trust and download the wallet!!!
This confusion hope soon is resolved as I really like the project and I want to support it.
Letâs hope and wish the team will make it as simple as possible for all users who want to join. Lots of things to happen before cardano can approach the average user.
Iâve been using the wallet with no problems, but Iâd suggest sending a support ticket to IOHK if you need confirmation that itâs all correct. I havenât contacted support or found a clear answer on this either, so I just gave up and decided to use it. (hope it works lol)
I am also a new user having a separate but I think related problem. I was able to hash the installer binary (for Windows) using the utility in cmd.exe, and I got the right output. Are you saying that in that case signature verification with GPG4Win is redundant? I hope so because I cannot find the asc.exe file so I havenât been able to perform that verification in Kleopatra.
(In these instructions: Daedalus - Downloads, iâm stuck at step 7)
~dw
Iâm in the same boat and I think this is a simple UX problem. I assume that the âVerify Signature Instructionsâ have not been updated. The problem is that this is preventing me from trusting the Daedalus wallet.
24 days after, I am on the sad position still not having downloaded the wallet on my computer due to lack of trust. Itâs probably just instructions to be updated but it doesnât inspire any confidence to put hard earned money with this pending !
Pity, I like the project and wanted to support it. Maybe later when this is addressed.
Firstly, on behalf of our team, I apologize for this late response.
We have conducted an investigation and found out that the reason why you received a different dialog was because you had a different (newer) version of GPG Services (comes when installing GPG Tools as per instruction), whereas the one that was used by the instruction was an older version of GPG Services.
Currently the latest GPG Services is version:2.1, If you install the latest version of GPG Tools (which you already have), you should be able to observe exactly the same dialog as the following:
We have also notified our web team to update the instruction page to be inline with the latest version of GPG Services.
I hope this helps. However, should you require further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us again.
In the meantime, thank you for bringing up the issue and once again we apologize for the delay in replying.