Thank you! I’m really curious to see the results.
Tried to answer it in the gist of:
I still think that the biggest problem are the assessments. Not even the “Catalyst people” believe that their star rating says anything about if a proposal should receive funding or not.
The sorting of proposals by the average rating has to go!
In fact, it doesn’t even make sense to compute an equally weighted average between the stars for the three assessment questions.
And I would still want to see the filtered out assessments, especially for the highly discussed “Turbo” proposal to really see if the problem of that assessment round was that there were no assessors who could see the massive problems with it or if there were critical assessments that were filtered out.
And, please, do not start another round before we have desktop voting! Ideally with the possibility to have independent voting clients that can also experiment with other recommendation mechanisms.