I’m spending quite a lot of time with Cardano since November as users of the forum may have noticed.
But for the two Catalyst voting rounds since then, I didn’t really assess all the options, but voted some proposals (far from a significant share of all proposals) up or down based on skimming through them in the voting app and gut feeling.
It’s not that important, because my voting power is not that high, but it’s still wrong. There is significant money given out (quite often, it seems, for things that other projects or even individuals give to the community for free, which gives me a little headache). And it should be possible to submit better educated votes.
But going through all of the proposals would be a full-time job during voting time. The assessments are probably there to help a bit, but they also have to be at least skimmed or we could just replace the voting by the assessment. And already looking at all the assessments would take hours.
After one proposal was presented here in the forum (Why are not more presented here? On the other hand, all of them presented here would make the forum quite unusable.), I finally got an Ideascale account. The flood of proposals is a bit better to grasp on a Desktop computer than on a phone, but it’s still overwhelming.
Is there some possibility to safe a list of “I plan to vote for this.”/“I plan to vote against this.”/“I need to evaluate this deeper.” decisions (for me personally) in Ideacale that I am overlooking? I only see “Subscribe” and that’s not what I want and much too broad. Also, importing this list into the voting app would be something between nice and necessary.
Are there other plans to make this whole thing more comprehensible for “just voters”?
Also: Why is there an Input-Output logo on Ideascale? I thought, the Catalyst process and funds are managed by the foundation? And why does the app greet me with a very prominent statement, what Charles himself thinks should be done in the current voting round?
Also also: Seriously?!?