So what is fair here?
That the devil always makes shit on top of the biggest pile ?
That Binance runs 60 nearly saturated pools and stakes automatically the assets deposed on their exchange in their own pools?
That people having recently jumped into Cardano have effort wo a realistic chance of getting rewards ?
That big stakes cause nearly the same effort as small ones but are higher rewarded ?
That marketing and access to social media wins over best ambitions and energy is waisted for promotion?
Mist likely fairness is not a common understood term
I have choosen my first pool to stake according to their mission, that is funding social projects, with the result that the pool disapeared after six weeks due to high cost and low revenue. I was not looking for income, just good ethics- was naive.
Why not implementing a „stake anywhere“ button and a „dismiss this pool“ button ?
I do not want to miss an important argument: consensus in the right time. From the papers I found I did not get a clear definition except that the longest fork is validated that confirms to the genesis block- does anyone have more precise infos or a good link here ?
Thank you and cheers