yes. that’s one possible way to implement mitigating things as they exist.
alternatively, another environment could exist that is community-centric - with permission protocols. free from the (unhelpful) constraints/limiting barriers.
very valid precaution, but centralised to who? not to accountable trusted(earned) community members? (with established/implemented protocols for various scenarios) if we do some simple maths, weighing the cost benefits, mid to long term things actually aren’t beneficial with the current implementation. i could expand extensively on this, but i’ll limit by just pointing to a simple illustration. if both the wiki and forum lived in the same environment, accounts could be linked. resulting in quality and quantity wiki contributions and conversations - by community members who get a sense of purpose and the rewards from that feedback loop. con-concurrently exponentially improving both the wiki and forum.
we need to be actively figuring out decentralisation, start severing the umbilical cord - otherwise we’ll forever be in utero, forever stunted, with any autonomy eroded away with escalating suffocating maternal gatekeeping…