Please have a look here:
Cardano is rated No. 44. Why?
a. Twitter Activity 0/20 - I do not see an issue with the Twitter activity, why is this 0?
b. Advisory Board Strength 0/100 - Well Cardano Project didn’t need advisors doing nothing, they hired everyone needed. All the projects who claim they have amazing advisory board is fake as the advisors do not have time to really contribute. They just give their names, fame & reputation, showing they trust or have been paid enough by the project.
c. Whitepaper 0/10 - really? https://whycardano.com/ & https://iohk.io/research/library/
Transaction per Second Compared to Other Coints 1/8 - ???
Is the Coins Inflation under Control? 15/30 - there should be no control, that’s the whole point of a decentralized cryptocurrency
What I was thinking is that as a Community we could identify all these rating / listing sites and split up the fair representation of the Cardano project among ourselves.
Then we would have a group of people following up and making sure that Cardano is rated in a fair & balanced way at particular sites. Would the site be unbalanced, the Group would contact the authors and fill a professional complaint maybe even having at that point the official mandate from the CF.
Obviously this might be extended beyond the Rating sites to Review Videos on YouTube.
From DogeCoin Founder, Jackson Palmer not a bad review, but really incomplete and a half job.
What do you think? Is there any initiative we may deal with such issues as a Community together?
Maybe a new Category for this, “Media Reputation” or something like that might make sense?