Nope, that’s not what I said at all. And contrary to what many people think, Black Swans are the rule, not the exception. The “Value-at-Risk” models that the banking sector used to evaluate risk ignored this reality, which is why 2008 smacked the world with a dose of reality. (There are many things I could say about this, but I’ll leave that for another day.)
What humans perceive as a “Black Swan” is actually an illusion created by their ignorance of all the systemic events occurring within an unstable system at any point in time. I alluded to this in Catastrophic Collapse: How to Visualize It?
Respectfully, if you can escape the reductionist framework, everything I’ve said should become much easier to understand and you won’t need to make any more inaccurate assumptions about what I actually said. 