Yes of course it would be a best effort approach and only a reactive capability.
You would simply have a coupe of new flags.
But it would help a lot I believe.
Focusing for instance on the trend, that there are some rarely used & suspicious anonymous accounts, which are not really used for positive contributions, but rather case-by-case for politics & shaping public opinion. We could remove all these posts and users to make the Forum a better place.
I have absolutely no issue with anonimity when it´s used in a responsible, adult way and being limiting in certain rights. But sometimes (as experienced) it´s just a means of tactics to have multiple accounts, being able to say things without consequences, have multiple votes casted, try to shape the public opinion without exposing your real commonly known identity, etc.
I think it is a work in progress. It would need much input from many across the board and CF included. I will apply my mind but I do feel CF have to stand up and be counted, without them been proactive with us all as one we howling at the moon.
emphasized text[quote=âknysna, post:59, topic:20157â]
But allows @Andy_Hendrikx another Ambassador to use foul language in the same sentence with Emergo and IOHK. Your Meritocracy principles have been corrupted and like governments many are implicit in towing a line.
[/quote]
I donât police every single comment in the forum, I prefer a laissez faire approach. I respond to flags, of you have an issue with someoneâs post, flag it and Iâll take a look.
Hang on are you You threatening me. @nathan_kaiser You better sort this spring chicken out very quickly flashing a Cardano Ambassadors profile and making threats.
Would you like to call your mommy as well. Iâll skip this one, any other moderators please take over. Since I am being personally targeted in this one.
So and whatâs the problem now?
IOHK is a company who sponsor quite a lot of stuff in order to research, develope and educate the crypto ecosystem.
I really wonder why you feel in the position to question this in a form, you absolutely donât like when done in the same form towards you.
You are not a judge, you are not a customer and you are not elected by anyone to do what you try to do now for many weeks here. It creates a lot of negative mood and let people abandon this place. And thatâs also why I believe the attempt to âformalizeâ this behaviour behind a group like âthe Watchdogsâ is a very bad idea.
I donât talk with filthy minded people that are proud of it. You even more childish than i expected.
However i have learnt to take weird people serious so i am going to take you serious. You need to go see a taxidermist mate. Shame on you.
All I can say is I feel very differently than you do. By whoâs standards do we judge peopleâs online behavior to determine their worthiness to be associated with the Cardano brand? Would a person with fundementalist Christian beliefs be appropriate for instance? My instincts tell me the road that you are proposing leads to a dark place. Your core concerns may have validity but your solution is wrong in my opinion. I would recommend that you spend more time thoroughly researching the issues and proposing a more nuanced solution that takes individual liberty into consideration.
Donnybaseball itâs not a video about cars or cookery books. Ask yourself if you would want your brand to be associated with that type of filth? Every community has core or fundamental foundation values, believe me not just Christian. The point from the beginning is that nobody did back ground checks and to tag the word Ambassador to individuals who are anonymous is courting trouble. As I said this could have been an easy fix and much of this could have been stopped if CF would have stepped up and did their work.