Agree shame on you all.
1 Like
Putting the dirt aside and trying to be constructive, I have been thinking maybe such an anonimity policy would be helpful to agree upon with the Community (please donĀ“t look or criticize the content, itĀ“s a draft, just focus on the approach if this makes sense or not).
3 Likes
I have nothing against discussing that on a principled basis, however the implementation of such a plan if accepted would prove to be quite a nightmare. I am sure the time spent monitoring all these items could be better used.
2 Likes
Yes of course it would be a best effort approach and only a reactive capability.
You would simply have a coupe of new flags.
But it would help a lot I believe.
Focusing for instance on the trend, that there are some rarely used & suspicious anonymous accounts, which are not really used for positive contributions, but rather case-by-case for politics & shaping public opinion. We could remove all these posts and users to make the Forum a better place.
I have absolutely no issue with anonimity when itĀ“s used in a responsible, adult way and being limiting in certain rights. But sometimes (as experienced) itĀ“s just a means of tactics to have multiple accounts, being able to say things without consequences, have multiple votes casted, try to shape the public opinion without exposing your real commonly known identity, etc.
1 Like
I think it is a work in progress. It would need much input from many across the board and CF included. I will apply my mind but I do feel CF have to stand up and be counted, without them been proactive with us all as one we howling at the moon.
2 Likes
emphasized text[quote=āknysna, post:59, topic:20157ā]
But allows @Andy_Hendrikx another Ambassador to use foul language in the same sentence with Emergo and IOHK. Your Meritocracy principles have been corrupted and like governments many are implicit in towing a line.
[/quote]
I donāt police 
every single comment in the forum, I prefer a laissez faire approach. I respond to flags, of you have an issue with someoneās post, flag it and Iāll take a look.
1 Like
No thank you, donāt believe in hiding behind a flag. Prefer for all to make their own judgement on what is shown.
1 Like
Perfect. Now I have you exactly where I wanted you. 
This is from your post before I asked my question
I asked for, but you wasnāt able to give clear names and proofs.
So the clear question towards you now is: Do you agree that
is something very bad that should happen in this forum?
1 Like
Of course I know, I was meaning this thread:
https://forum.cardano.org/t/the-cardano-effect-podcast-transparency-statement/
āThe Cardano Effect is sponsored by IOHK. We are not IOHK employees. We are open to other sponsors now and in the future.ā
1 Like
2 Likes
Ha ha ha 
What a joke.
Hang on are you You threatening me.
@nathan_kaiser You better sort this spring chicken out very quickly flashing a Cardano Ambassadors profile and making threats.
2 Likes
Would you like to call your mommy as well. Iāll skip this one, any other moderators please take over. Since I am being personally targeted in this one.
1 Like
Can you please explain to the community why you posted a video of Sean acting in a production ?
1 Like
So and whatās the problem now?
IOHK is a company who sponsor quite a lot of stuff in order to research, develope and educate the crypto ecosystem.
I really wonder why you feel in the position to question this in a form, you absolutely donāt like when done in the same form towards you.
You are not a judge, you are not a customer and you are not elected by anyone to do what you try to do now for many weeks here. It creates a lot of negative mood and let people abandon this place. And thatās also why I believe the attempt to āformalizeā this behaviour behind a group like āthe Watchdogsā is a very bad idea.
2 Likes
Mate you just attacked the Watchdogs on the other thread posted by your retired agent.
https://forum.cardano.org/t/an-open-letter-from-several-former-guardians
Here you signed an incredible lie.
You are getting sloppy Markus.
1 Like
do you want to distract from something where you donāt have the arguments? 
1 Like
I donāt talk with filthy minded people that are proud of it. You even more childish than i expected.
However i have learnt to take weird people serious so i am going to take you serious. You need to go see a taxidermist mate. Shame on you.
2 Likes
Yes Zenman, read my post and explanation. Take your time, reflect and then ask the question would you put your trust in someone like that.
2 Likes
All I can say is I feel very differently than you do. By whoās standards do we judge peopleās online behavior to determine their worthiness to be associated with the Cardano brand? Would a person with fundementalist Christian beliefs be appropriate for instance? My instincts tell me the road that you are proposing leads to a dark place. Your core concerns may have validity but your solution is wrong in my opinion. I would recommend that you spend more time thoroughly researching the issues and proposing a more nuanced solution that takes individual liberty into consideration.
3 Likes